In Tetley v Chitty, when is a landlord liable for nuisance?

In the case of Tetley v Chitty, a landlord can be held liable for nuisance if they either consent to or are aware of the activities that are causing the nuisance. This principle rests on the idea that if a landlord knows that tenants are engaging in disruptive behavior that leads to a nuisance, and does not take appropriate action to remedy the situation, they can be held responsible.

In essence, liability arises from the landlord's knowledge and lack of intervening action. If they are aware of the nuisance or have knowingly allowed it to continue without addressing the issue, it reflects a failure to uphold their duty to prevent disturbances that affect neighbors or the surrounding community. This case illustrates that mere ownership of the property does not impose liability; rather, it is the knowledge and consent regarding the nuisance that can result in responsibility.